Monday, August 19, 2013

‘More aggressive’: Greenwald vows to publish more secrets after UK detains partner

‘More aggressive’: Greenwald vows to publish more secrets after UK detains partner

David Miranda (2nd L), partner of U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald (L), speaks to the media at Rio de Janeiro's International Airport August 19, 2013. (Reuters/Ricardo Moraes)

Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who first published secrets leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, promised Monday to release more documents, saying the UK would be “sorry” for detaining his partner for nine hours.
The journalist’s partner, David Miranda, was held by British authorities under anti-terrorism laws while transiting through London’s Heathrow Airport on his way to Rio de Janeiro on Sunday.
The US government has released a statement saying that British officials told them about their decision to detain Miranda, although Washington denied its own involvement. 
"This is a decision they made on their own," White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at a briefing.
The move by UK authorities sparked a furious response from Greenwald.
"I have many more documents to report on, including ones about the UK, where I'll now focus more. I will be more aggressive, not less, in reporting,"  said Greenwald, speaking in Portuguese to reporters at Rio de Janeiro's international airport, Reuters reported.
"When they do things like this, they show the world their real character. It'll backfire. I think they'll come to regret it," he said.
There was also angry reaction from Brazilian authorities, as well as from journalists and human rights activists in the UK.
The Brazilian government said in statement that Miranda’s detention was “without justification.”
The Guardian said it was dismayed at the detention of Miranda and was “urgently seeking clarification from the British authorities” as to why it happened.
Keith Vaz, a Labor lawmaker who chairs parliament's powerful interior affairs committee, told the BBC that he had written to the head of London's Metropolitan Police to ask for clarification of what he labeled an "extraordinary" case.
“Now you have a complaint from Mr. Greenwald and the Brazilian government. They have said that they are concerned at the use of terrorism legislation for something that does not appear to relate to terrorism. So it needs to be clarified and clarified quickly,” said Vaz.

U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald stands with his partner David Miranda as they wait for the lift at Rio de Janeiro's International Airport August 19, 2013. (Reuters/Ricardo Moraes)
U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald stands with his partner David Miranda as they wait for the lift at Rio de Janeiro's International Airport August 19, 2013. (Reuters/Ricardo Moraes)
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said that “swift answers” were needed as to why Miranda was detained for so long.

“Any suggestion that terror powers are being misused must be investigated and clarified urgently - the public support for these powers must not be endangered by a perception of misuse,” she said.
Labour MP Tom Watson called for parliament to look into what he said could be an attempt to “get the genie back into the bottle” when it returns from summer recess in September.
He also questioned whether government ministers had been briefed of the move which he said was “clearly an embarrassment for the government.”
Michael Mansfield, one of Britain's leading human rights lawyers, told Reuters that the action amounted to an act of oppression.
“The detention of David Miranda is a disgrace and reinforces the undoubted complicity of the UK in US indiscriminate surveillance of law-abiding citizens. The fact that Snowden, and now anyone remotely associated with him, are being harassed as potential spies and terrorists is sheer unadulterated state oppression," he said.
Widney Brown, Amnesty International senior director of international law and policy, questioned what danger Miranda could possibly be to the UK government.
“He was detained under a law that violates any principle of fairness and his detention shows how the law can be used for petty vindictive reasons. There is simple no basis for believing that David Miranda presents any threat whatsoever to the UK government,” she told the Daily Mail.
Journalists groups have also accused the authorities of misusing their powers against "terrorism."
“Journalism may be embarrassing and annoying for governments but it is not terrorism,” Bob Stachwell from the Society of Editors told the BBC.
Miranda, 28, who is a Brazilian citizen, said he was questioned for nine hours by numerous agents before being released without charge. Authorities seized his laptop, mobile phone, and flash drives.
He said that six British agents questioned him on all aspects of his life and only released him after he started shouting in the airport lounge. He was traveling from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil after visiting US filmmaker Lauro Poitras, who has been working on the Snowden files with Greenwald and the Guardian.
The Daily Mail reported that Miranda was carrying USB drives of encrypted documents from Edward Snowden.
Greenwald didn’t confirm what Miranda was carrying but said that only he and Poitras have “copies of the full archives of NSA documents which Edward Snowden gave to journalists, so much of the speculation about what [Miranda] was or wasn’t carrying is misinformed.”
The Metropolitan Police confirmed that a 28-year-old man was held from 08:05 BST until 17:00 BST, under Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 2000, which allows police to hold someone at an airport for nine hours for questioning.
The UK Home Office did not comment on Miranda’s detention, but has defended Schedule 7 in the past.
David Anderson, the official independent reviewer on the UK’s terrorism legislation, said he asked authorities why Miranda was detained for so long. Of the 69,000 people detained under Schedule 7 in 2011-2012, only 40 were held for six hours or more. In most cases, people are released after less than an hour.
Snowden, who has been granted asylum by Russia, gave Greenwald up to 20,000 documents with details about the US National Security Agency and the UK’s GCHQ surveillance operations.

Bloomberg reveals largest gun seizure ever in New York

Bloomberg reveals largest gun seizure ever in New York

New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg (R) holds a news conference with seized guns at the police headquarters in New York August 19, 2013 (Reuters / Eric Thayer)New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg (R) holds a news conference with seized guns at the police headquarters in New York August 19, 2013 (Reuters / Eric Thayer)

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday that his administration has successfully carried out the largest gun seizure in the city’s history.
At a Monday morning press conference, Mayor Bloomberg and Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly announced that authorities in New York have managed to indict and arrest 19 individuals believed responsible for running an illegal gun pipeline from North and South Carolina to NYC along the Interstate 95 corridor.
As the result of an undercover investigation, Bloomberg said city officials netted the largest gun bust ever to come out of New York, collecting more than 250 illegal firearms, including high capacity assault weapons, a fully automatic machine gun and guns that are commonly used in violent crimes across the city.
There is no doubt that the seizure of these guns has saved lives,” Mayor Bloomberg said at the press conference. “New York City, I’m happy to say, is the safest big city in the nation. We’re continuing to make our city even safer.”
Commissioner Kelly said the firearm pipeline was discovered last year as the result of an unrelated narcotics investigation targeting an operation thought to be trafficking drugs out of Brooklyn. That probe led investigators to a 26-year-old aspiring rapper, Matthew Best, who recorded songs from an Ocean Hill, Brooklyn recording studio in which he boasted of “packing more guns than the Air Force.”
Once Best was brought onto the police’s radar, law enforcement linked him to 29-year-old Walter Walker of Sanford, South Carolina. Walker, according to police, purchased stolen guns cheaply in North and South Carolina, and then took a discounted bus to New York City where he sold them with the assistance of Best. In one instance, police said, Walker carried as many as 14 guns in his luggage while he took public transportation from North Carolina up to New York.
Those who were selling the guns to Walker knew they were intended for distribution in New York, and they knew that the guns were illegal in New York,” Special Narcotics Prosecutor Bridget Brennan said at the presser.

Seized guns are pictured at the police headquarters in New York August 19, 2013 (Reuters / Eric Thayer)
Seized guns are pictured at the police headquarters in New York August 19, 2013 (Reuters / Eric Thayer)
Police say that 11 of the nearly 60 gun buys occurred at the Ocean Hill recording studio, and that 254 firearms in total were obtained by an undercover officer who was on the receiving end of 58 exchanges in less than a year.
Walker “had no shortage of supply or suppliers,” Kelly said, “so the NYPD made sure it was Walker’s only New York customer.”
From last September through this July, the undercover agent purchased 116 guns from Walker, most of which came fullu loaded, according to authorities. Through those interactions, the undercover officer also befriended 23-year-old Earl Campbell of Rock Hill, South Carolina, who before long began bringing firearms up to New York via the so-called “Chinatown bus” service.
Police say they relied on court-authorized wiretaps to monitor their suspects, and in one conversation learned that Campbell was concerned that the “stop and frisk” tactics used by the NYPD posed a large risk of being apprehended with contraband. New York officials are currently appealing a federal ruling that last week mandated the NYPD the reform its policies.
I think generally it’s believed by law enforcement people that without this tactic, the bad guys would feel a lot more comfortable in carrying guns,” Mayor Bloomberg said early Monday. “They carried guns before. They aren’t carrying guns now,” he added, “Common sense says that if you run a risk of getting stopped, you’re going to pay more attention to what’s in your pocket.”
In all, police were able to indict 19 individuals linked to either Walker or Campbell for their alleged involvement in gun trafficking. Walker was charged with conspiracy along with six others, and faces more than 250 counts, including three counts of a criminal sale of a firearm in the first degree. Campbell has been indicted on more than 200 counts as well.
Bloomberg, whose third and final term as New York mayor will expire early next year, has long advocated for gun control. In 2006 he co-founded the Mayors Against Illegal Guns national, bipartisan coalition, which today boasts more than 1,000 representatives from 46 states. Mayor Bloomberg personally invested $3 million into the campaign, which he says brings those city leaders together to fight crime with “a belief that we can do more to stop criminals from getting guns while also protecting the rights of citizens to freely own them.”

 

Radiation levels in Fukushima bay highest since measurements began - reports

Radiation levels in Fukushima bay highest since measurements began - reports

Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (Reuters / apan Maritime Self-Defence Force)Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (Reuters / apan Maritime Self-Defence Force)

Readings of tritium in seawater taken from the bay near the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant has shown 4700 becquerels per liter, a TEPCO report stated, according to Nikkei newspaper. It marks the highest tritium level in the measurement history.
Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has detected the highest radiation level in seawater collected in the harbor of the crippled nuclear plant in the past 15 days, Nikkei reports
TEPCO said the highest radiation level was detected near reactor 1. Previous measurements showed tritium levels at 3800 becquerels per liter near reactor 1, and 2600 becquerels per liter near reactor 2. The concentration of tritium in the harbor’s seawater has been continuously rising since May, according to Nikkei. 
Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen which is produced by nuclear reactors. It is potentially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. The legal limits for Tritium in terms of becquerels per liter vary from country to country. The World Health Organization has a limit of 10,000 Bq/l, but the European Union’s limit is much lower, at 100 Bq/l.
Also on Monday, a leak of highly contaminated water was discovered from a drain valve of a tank dike located on the premises of the nuclear plant, according to Fukushima’s operator responsible for the clean-up.
The level of radiation at the site was estimated at 100 millisieverts per hour, while the safe level of radiation is 1-13 millisieverts per year, according to ITAR-TASS news agency.  The plant’s operator is currently investigating reasons for the leak, TEPCO said in a statement.
Earlier, Tepco admitted that an estimated 20 to 40 trillion becquerel’s of tritium may have flowed into the Pacific Ocean since the nuclear disaster.
Three of the plant’s reactors suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011 after a massive earthquake struck the area, triggering a tsunami. The plant has been accumulating radioactive water ever since, as groundwater passing through the premises becomes contaminated.

Protective barriers installed to prevent the flow of toxic water into the ocean have failed to do so. The level of contaminated water has already risen to 60cm above the barriers, which has been a major cause of the daily leak of toxic substances, TEPCO admitted.

Japan’s Ministry of Industry recently estimated that around  300 tons of contaminated groundwater has been seeping into the Pacific Ocean on a daily basis. TEPCO has promised to reinforce protective shields to keep radioactive leaks at bay.

 

Prosecution asks for minimum of 60 years in Manning case

Prosecution asks for minimum of 60 years in Manning case

U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning (R) (AFP Photo)

As a military judge prepares to sentence Army Private first class Bradley Manning over the largest intelligence leak in United States history, prosecutors asked Monday for the WikiLeaks source to receive no fewer than 60 years behind bars.
Before closing arguments in the sentencing phase of Pfc. Manning’s court-martial came to a close Monday afternoon, US prosecutors asked Col. Denise Lind to send the convicted soldier to prison for “no less than 60 years.”
David Coombs, the lead civilian attorney for Pfc. Manning, asked Lind for "a sentence that allows him to have a life."
Manning would be able to apply for parole once one-third of that time is served.
Manning, 25, faces a maximum of 90 years in prison for sharing a trove of classified documents with the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks while deployed as an Army intelligence analyst in Iraq. He was arrested in May 2010 and spent over 1,100 days in pretrial detainment before his court-martial began in Ft. Meade, Maryland on June 3.
Last month, Col. Lind convicted Manning of 20 counts but acquitted him of the most serious: aiding the enemy. Prosecutors argued Pfc. Manning’s disclosure directly benefited the operations of al-Qaeda extremists, and could have pursued the death penalty against the soldier.
Litigation in the historic court-martial concluded Monday afternoon with Col. Lind announcing that she will reconvene Tuesday morning before beginning the deliberating process. Followers of the case expect a sentence to be handed out as early as Tuesday afternoon.
Now as Col. Lind prepares to debate the future of Pfc. Manning, prosecutors asked her during Monday’s remarks to “send a message to any other soldier contemplating disclosing classified information.”
If you "betray your country, you do not deserve the mercy of a court of law,” Cpt. Joe Morrow said for the prosecution.
Manning’s counsel has already stated they will appeal any sentence handed down, perhaps all the way to the Supreme Court.
As the sentencing phase neared to a close last week, Coombs called on members of Manning’s family and the soldier himself to speak before the court. Although the counsel has largely represented their client as a humanist who went to WikiLeaks to blow the whistle on atrocities of war, last week’s testimonies turned towards portraying Manning additionally as an intelligent but troubled young soldier who struggled with gender identity dysphonia in a discriminatory arena after a childhood tainted by abusive, alcoholic parents.
Witnesses called last Thursday also included a forensic psychiatrist who testified that Manning exhibited traits of grandiosity and haughtiness, and a clinical psychologist who said the soldier’s anxiety was exasperated greatly during deployment.
Being deployed in general is difficult for anyone,” Capt. Michael Worsley testified. “You put him in this environment, this sort of hyper masculine environment if you will, and with little support and we coping skills, pressure would have been difficult to say the least. It would have been incredible.”
According to both doctors, Manning could have been court-martialed earlier in his deployment had he spoke openly about his gender identity issues.
During earlier proceedings, Manning admitted to leaking State Department diplomatic cables, activity reports from the Iraq and Afghan Wars and a trove of other material to WikiLeaks in part to lift the “fog of war.”
I want people to see the truth…regardless of who they are…because without information, you cannot make informed decisions as a public,” Manning wrote before his 2010 arrest.
In his statement last week, however, Manning suggested that in hindsight his attempt at world change was futile.
How on earth could I, a junior analyst, possibly believe I could change the world for the better over the decisions of those with the proper authority?” Pfc. Manning said.
"I am sorry for the unintended consequences of my actions,” a tearful, trembling Manning told the court. “When I made these decisions I believed I was going to help people, not hurt people."
Earlier on in the merits phase of the court-martial, prosecutors attempted to label Manning an “information anarchist” who knew fully well that releasing classified documents could aid America’s adversaries.
He was not a whistleblower, he was a traitor,” Maj. Ashden Fein said in court last month. “He was not a humanist, he was a hacker.”
When prosecutors made their final remarks on Monday, they portrayed Pfc. Manning to the court as a determined insider who exploited an imperfect system.
"No step we can take as nation, as military, that’s going to stop determined insider,” the prosecution said. “Our systems will always be exploitable."
The biggest crime,” Manning is guilty of, countered Coombs, "is that he cared about the loss of life that he was seeing.”

How does a polyamorous relationship between four people work?

How does a polyamorous relationship between four people work?

From top left, clockwise: Sarah, Chris, Charlie and Tom
From top left, clockwise: Sarah, Chris, Charlie and Tom

Imagine one house, with four people, but five couples. How does it work, asks Jo Fidgen.
Charlie is talking excitedly about a first date she went on the night before.
Next to her on the sofa is her husband of six years, Tom. And on the other side of him is Sarah, who's been in a relationship with Tom for the last five years. Sarah's fiance, Chris, is in the kitchen making a cup of tea.
The two women are also in a full-blown relationship, while the two men are just good friends. Together, they make a polyamorous family and share a house in Sheffield.
"We're planning to grow old together," says Charlie.
Polyamory is the practice of having simultaneous intimate relationships with more than one person at a time, with the knowledge and consent of all partners. The term entered the Oxford English Dictionary only in 2006, and such relationships are rare enough that Tom finds himself having to account for his personal situation time and time again.

Find out more

"The number of conversations I've had with peers where I've started to explain it and they've got as far as, 'so, you all cheat on each other' and not been able to get past that. I've said no, everybody's cool with it, everybody knows what's happening, no one's deceiving each other."
If any of the four want to get involved with someone else, they have to run it by the others - all of whom have a veto.
"We can't use a veto for something as silly as, say, personal taste," says Sarah. "If you were dating somebody and I could not understand why you found them attractive, that would not be sufficient reason for me to say, no, you can't see this person."

What is Polyamory?

Man holding hands with two women
The word entered the Oxford English Dictionary in 2006, where it is defined as:
"The fact of having simultaneous close emotional relationships with two or more other individuals, viewed as an alternative to monogamy, esp. in regard to matters of sexual fidelity; the custom or practice of engaging in multiple sexual relationships with the knowledge and consent of all partners concerned."
What counts as infidelity, then?
"Lying," they chorus.
"For example," explains Charlie, "before I went on this first date yesterday, I sat down with each of my three partners and checked with them individually that I was okay to go on this date. Cheating would have been me sneaking off and saying I was meeting Friend X and not say that it was a potential romantic partner."
The rules and boundaries of their relationships are carefully negotiated.
When they had been a couple for just two weeks, Tom suggested to Charlie that they be non-monogamous.
"It was a light bulb moment for me," she says. 'I had been scared of commitment because I had never met anyone I felt I could fall completely and exclusively in love with. The idea of this not being a monogamous relationship allowed me to fall as deeply in love with Tom as I wanted to without fear that I would break his heart by falling in love with somebody else as well."
But how did she feel when, a year into their marriage, Tom fell in love with another woman?
"Well, Sarah's lovely," says Charlie. "I was just so happy that Tom was happy with her."
From top left, clockwise: Chris, Tom, Charlie, Sarah
Sarah's partner, Chris, was less comfortable with the situation at first. They had agreed that they could have other sexual partners, but forming an emotional attachment with someone else was a different matter.
So when Sarah fell for Tom, she agonised over how to tell Chris.
"We sat down and talked about what it meant to be in love with more than one person, and did that mean I loved him less. Well, of course it didn't.
"It's not like there's only so much love I have to give and I have to give all of it to one person. I can love as many people as I can fit in my heart and it turns out that's quite a few."

Previously in the Magazine

In interviews, people in open marriages say that although it is not for everyone, it is absolutely possible for adults to be in committed, emotionally satisfying relationships with more than one person at a time.
Chris and Tom bonded over video games and became firm friends. Before long, Chris had fallen in love with Tom's wife, Charlie.
"It had never crossed Chris's mind not to be monogamous - now he says he could never go back," says Sarah.
This quandary over how to manage relationships is something that couples counsellor, Esther Perel, sees people struggling with all the time.
"You can live in a monogamous institution and you can negotiate monotony, or you can live in a non-monogamous choice and negotiate jealousy. Pick your evil.
"If you are opening it up you have to contend with the fact that you're not the only one, and if you are not opening it up then you have to contend with the fact that your partner is the only one."
So how do Charlie, Sarah and Tom handle jealousy?
Not a problem, they insist, and point to a word invented in polyamorous circles to indicate the opposite feeling.
Bride and groomMany people consider monogamy the only option in a relationship
"Compersion," explains Tom, "is the little warm glow that you get when you see somebody you really care about loving somebody else and being loved."
"There's always a small amount of insecurity," reflects Sarah, recalling how she felt when her fiance fell in love with Charlie. "But compare my small amount of discomfort with the huge amount of love that I could see in both of them, and honestly, I'd feel like a really mean person if I said my discomfort was more important than their happiness."
Jealousy has to be handled differently in a polyamorous relationship, adds Charlie.
"In a two-person, monogamous relationship, it's not necessary but it is possible to say, we just need to cut out all of the people who are causing jealousy and then everything will be fine.
"Whereas when you are committed to a multi-partner relationship, you can't just take that shortcut. You have to look at the reasons behind the jealousy."
If an issue does arise, the four may stay up all night talking it over.

Start Quote

The thing about a monogamous relationship, it can give you some sense of certainty and surety, somewhere you can feel safe and at home.”
Marian O'Connor
"We do so much more talking than sex," laughs Charlie.
But some argue that it is natural for people to bond in pairs.
Our desire for monogamy has deep roots, says Marian O'Connor, a psychosexual therapist at the Tavistock Centre for Couple Relationships in London.
"As children we need someone who loves us best of all in order to thrive. There's normally one main care giver, usually the mother, who will look after the infant.
"The thing about a monogamous relationship, it can give you some sense of certainty and surety, somewhere you can feel safe and at home."
Sarah, Tom and Charlie agree that a safe base is important, but see no reason why only monogamy can provide one.
"I feel safe and secure, with the ability to trust and grow, with Tom, Sarah and Chris," says Charlie. "It is from the base and security of the three of them that I face the world and the challenges the day brings."
"The way I see it, it's only a problem if I feel like one of my partners is spending more time with all their other partners than with me," says Sarah. "It just leads to people feeling hurt."
A shared Google calendar is the answer.
"We mostly use it for keeping track of date nights," says Charlie. "The couple who is on a date gets first pick of what film goes on the TV and it helps keep track of who's in what bedroom."
Sarah chips in. "So, for example, I have a weekly date night with Charlie. It's us snuggling up, us with the TV, us going to bed together and all that kind of business."

Start Quote

I'm preparing for 30 years of being made fun of”
Charlie
Perel sees polyamory as "the next frontier" - a way of avoiding having to choose between monotony and jealousy.
"We have a generation of people coming up who are saying, we also want stability and committed relationships and safety and security, but we also want individual fulfilment. Let us see if we can negotiate monogamy or non-monogamy in a consensual way that prevents a lot of the destructions and pains of infidelity."
But it's not an easy option.
"We get funny looks in the street," says Sarah.
"And every time you out yourself, you risk losing a friend," adds Charlie. "I'm preparing for 30 years of being made fun of."
Tom is cautiously optimistic that polyamory will become "average and everyday".
"Anyone who is expecting some massive social change overnight is terribly mistaken, but it will happen."
In the meantime, the four of them are planning an unofficial ceremony to mark their commitment to each other.
"Sometimes people just write the relationship off as a lazy way of getting more sex than you normally would. There are easier ways," says Tom wryly.
They all agree managing a multi-partner relationship can be exhausting.
"But we don't have a choice. We're in love with each other," they chime.

Chelsea: Exciting times ahead under Jose Mourinho, says Nevin

Lukaku Mourinho De Bruyne

Chelsea: Exciting times ahead under Jose Mourinho, says Nevin

ose Mourinho returned to Stamford Bridge to start his second spell as Chelsea manager, overseeing a comfortable 2-0 win over Hull City.
Buoyed by the adulation surrounding their manager's reappearance, a confident Chelsea were thwarted by an early penalty save from Hull keeper Allan McGregor, before Oscar and Frank Lampard put them two goals up by the 25th minute.

Mourinho at Chelsea

  • Premier League titles: (2) 2004-05 and 2005-06
  • FA Cups: (1) 2006-07
  • League Cups: (2) 2004-05 and 2006-07
  • Community Shields: (1) 2005
Mourinho introduced new faces, such as Andre Schurrle, and gave Romelu Lukaku, back from a season-long loan at West Brom, the chance to impress in the second half.
Former Chelsea winger Pat Nevin, speaking to BBC Radio 5 live, assessed what was new, and what was familiar about the return of "The Special One".

Changes to last season

Mourinho stayed very much with the system and style of the previous manager, Rafa Benitez, with a similar 4-2-3-1 formation.
It was clear that Mourinho was trying to get an extremely high tempo from the start. At times last season, Chelsea jogged into games, but he is not going to allow that to happen.
If it gets dull in the first 15 minutes of the second half, Mourinho will not be afraid to change it because he has a bench of people who want to give it a go.
I think Stamford Bridge was a good place to have a season ticket last season. I know there was a bad feeling about Benitez, but I thought it was a very entertaining team. Bring Kevin De Bruyne into that team, with Eden Hazard and Schurrle, and you are really going to enjoy it. I'm not saying Chelsea are definitely going to win the league, but people will not get bored.

A more attacking Chelsea

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich brought the manager back to get celebratory football and excitement, to get games where they win four-, five- or six-nil - which looked as if it could have been on.
This is going to be a tight league. Goal difference will matter and Chelsea should get all the goals they can
Mourinho often makes tactical adaptations during matches, but in the past it was to sit someone deeper. Now it looks like his changes will be to get Chelsea to press on. I think he will be urging them to win games three- or four-nil. This is going to be a tight league. Goal difference will matter and Chelsea should get all the goals they can.
In the second half, it looked like an old Chelsea-Mourinho performance. They did just enough, they were not hurting themselves a great deal, and maybe looking to Aston Villa on Wednesday.

Lukaku will have a big role

I was slightly surprised Lukaku did not get the call, I thought he would have started instead of Fernando Torres.
He played against very good teams in pre-season, like Roma and Real Madrid, and, today, Lukaku looked the better of the two. At 20, he is the future of Chelsea.
Lukaku looked fantastic and did a huge amount when he came on, while Torres looked tired again. Lukaku will be called for by Chelsea fans if it's not working because they have seen that he can add something.

New faces will push established names

Based on his first-half performance, De Bruyne, who is only 22, is going to test Juan Mata, Oscar and Hazard.

De Bruyne's English roots

Kevin de Bruyne's mother was born in Ealing, west London, making him eligible to play internationally for England. However, he opted for the country of his birth, making his debut for Belgium in August 2010 while still a teenager
Those three will not start all the time and De Bruyne looks good enough. He had great vision and energy, and a touch more power than those three. He can be delighted with how he played on Sunday.
Marco Van Ginkel is an out-and-out sitting midfielder, and I expected him to start against Hull. I think he will be a massive player for Chelsea this season, allowing them to play a 4-1-4-1 without two deep-lying midfielders. He is such a specialist in that area.
We didn't see much of him or Schurrle, who I saw a bit of in pre-season. He looks like he will fit in just fine and will bring decent pace up the wing.
Every one of these young players is improving and there are exciting times ahead for Chelsea.

Yohan Cabaye: Arsenal in £10m bid to sign Newcastle midfielder

Yohan Cabaye

Yohan Cabaye: Arsenal in £10m bid to sign Newcastle midfielder

Arsenal have made an offer in the region of £10m for Newcastle midfielder Yohan Cabaye.
The Magpies are yet to formally reject the offer for the 27-year-old France international but they view it as derisory and plan to turn it down.
Arsenal, who lost their opening game of the season 3-1 at home to Aston Villa, have declined to comment but are looking to reinforce their midfield.

Cabaye in focus

  • Yohan Cabaye has made 73 appearances for Newcastle and scored 11 goals.
The Gunners have been hit by injuries to Mikel Arteta and Abou Diaby.
Newcastle have no appetite to sell Cabaye, but will not rule out the sale of any playerfollowing their experience with Andy Carroll in 2011.
Having insisted the striker was not for sale at any price, they sold him to Liverpool for £35m on the last day of the January transfer window.
Cabaye is set to play in Newcastle's game at Manchester City on Monday.
He has made 73 appearances for the club since joining from Lille in June 2011 and made his top-flight debut against the Gunners in a goalless draw.
Arsenal's only summer signing to date remains 20-year-old French strikerYaya Sanogo on a free transfer from Auxerre, while numerous players have left Emirates Stadium.
Following the home defeat by Villa, the transfer policy of the Gunners and manager Arsene Wenger have come in for criticism from the Arsenal Supporters' Trust (AST).
BBC Sport pundit Alan Hansen also believes Wenger needsreinforcements in "four or five" positions.
Arsenal play the first leg of their Champions League group stage play-off against Fenerbahce in Turkey on Wednesday.

Egyptian police killed in Sinai ambush at Rafah

Egyptian police killed in Sinai ambush at Rafah

Scene of a car bomb at El Arish in Sinai (24 July 2013)Sinai has seen almost daily militant attacks in recent weeks, including this car bomb in El Arish in July
At least 24 Egyptian policemen have been killed in an ambush attack in the Sinai peninsula.
Medical sources and officials said the police were in two buses which came under attack from armed men close to the town of Rafah on the Gaza border.
A state of emergency is in force across Egypt amid wider political turmoil following a military crackdown on Islamists in which hundreds have died.
Thirty-six protesters died in a prison van on Sunday.
The recent violence has caused an international outcry.
EU foreign ministers are meeting on Wednesday to decide whether to cut some of the billions of euros in aid pledged to the country.
But Saudi Arabia has reportedly said it "will not hesitate to help" Egypt's interim government - which was formed after the military removed Mr Morsi from power - if Western nations cut their aid packages.

Analysis

The northern Sinai has become one of the most dangerous places in Egypt since 2011.
The area is a crossroads for local Bedouin smuggling and criminal gangs, Egyptian jihadists and militants with links to the adjacent Gaza strip. Kidnapping, the smuggling of guns and explosives, and attacks on Egypt's security forces have proliferated since the end of President Mubarak's military rule in 2011.
The Sinai Peninsula, scene of heavy fighting in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, is host to an international observer force of soldiers deployed to monitor the peace since the 1979 treaty with Israel but they have neither the mandate nor the capacity to stop the Sinai descending into lawlessness.
So far, the tourist resort of Sharm El Sheikh [at the southern tip of the Sinai] has remained immune to the post-Arab Spring violence.
It is too early to tell if this attack is in direct response to events in Cairo and other mainland Egyptian cities and there was no immediate claim of responsibility.
Meanwhile, a lawyer for Hosni Mubarak has said he expects the former leader to be released from prison within the next two days.
Lawyer Fareed al-Dib told the BBC Mubarak had been cleared of one of the corruption charges and they were waiting for the court to check whether he still had to be held in custody on other charges.
Mubarak is facing a retrial for corruption and complicity in the deaths of protesters during the 2011 uprising.
While it is still no more than a rumour his release would be seen by many Egyptians as a signal that the military is rolling back the changes that flowed from the uprising of 2011, the BBC's Kevin Connolly reports from Cairo.
Prison van deaths
There were conflicting reports about how Monday's attack in the Sinai unfolded.
Security sources quoted by the Associated Press news agency say four armed men stopped the buses and forced the police to get out before shooting them.
But other reports spoke of rocket-propelled grenades being fired at the buses.
Three policemen were also reported to have been injured in the blast.
The Rafah border post into Gaza was closed in response to the attack and security increased at checkpoints on the peninsula.

Egypt's recent violence

  • Wednesday 14 August - official figures say 638 people died as security forces shut down pro-Morsi protest camps in Cairo
  • Thursday 15 August - police authorised to use live fire to protect government buildings
  • Friday 16 August - 173 people are killed in clashes around Cairo's Ramses Square, during a "day of anger" over Wednesday's army operation
  • Saturday 17 August - security forces lay siege to and forcibly clear the al-Fath mosque in Cairo, being used as a pro-Morsi base and hospital.
  • Sunday 18 August - 36 Islamist prisoners die as they are being transported to a prison outside Cairo.
The military recently intensified a crackdown against militants in Sinai, where attacks have surged since 2011.
Egyptian deployments in the peninsula are subject to the 1979 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt.
Egypt's interim, military-backed leaders have declared a state of emergency amid the nationwide unrest which has followed the ousting of Islamist Mohammed Morsi as president on 3 July.
A night-time curfew is in place in the capital, Cairo, and many other provinces.
More than 830 people, including 70 police and soldiers, are reported to have been killed since Wednesday, when the army cleared protest camps set up by Morsi supporters, many of them members of the Muslim Brotherhood movement.
On Sunday night, 36 Islamists died as they were being transported to a prison outside Cairo.
Government and military officials said they had suffocated in the back of a prison van from the effects of tear gas, which was fired when the prisoners rioted.
But there were other reports of gunfire.
Map
The Brotherhood said the interior ministry had "decided to betray its trust and ignore its role" and had killed the detainees "for their opposition to the bloody military council".
It said the "heinous crime shows the total disregard of the right to life by these murderous fascist thugs" and raised concerns about the safety of the hundreds of pro-Morsi activists now in detention.
Wednesday's meeting of EU foreign ministers was agreed during preparatory talks with senior diplomats in Brussels.
EU special envoy Bernardino Leon said the ministers would consider a variety of options - including an arms embargo - but would work from the premise that a political solution to the crisis in Egypt is possible.
Mr Morsi's supporters say the removal of Egypt's first freely elected president was a coup.
However the interim government says the Muslim Brotherhood has carried out a campaign of terror since he was overthrown.
The head of the armed forces, Gen Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, has warned the military will not tolerate unrest.

36 Brotherhood detainees die near Cairo as Islamists attack prison convoy

36 Brotherhood detainees die near Cairo as Islamists attack prison convoy

Reuters / Khaled Abdullah Ali Al Mahdi
Reuters / Khaled Abdullah Ali Al Mahdi

Dozens of Muslim Brotherhood supporters died on Sunday as police escorting prisoners in trucks exchanged fire with Islamist attackers near Cairo. Conflicting reports stated that some or all of those killed suffocated from tear gas.
Thirty-six Islamist prisoners were killed in Egypt while being transferred to Abu Zaabal prison in northern Cairo, Egypt’s Interior Ministry said. Police used force to prevent the escape of the prisoners when they began to riot.
"Thirty-six of the prisoners died of suffocation and crowding after tear gas was used to stop their escape,"the ministry said.
However, several different accounts of events emerged in Egyptian media, alleging the involvement of a group of gunmen who attacked the prisoner convoy. Furthermore, there were reports that a police officer was taken hostage by detainees during the melee.
According to the version given by the state media on EGYNews.net and quoted by RT’s Bel Trew, a police truck transporting detainees was attacked by a group of armed men. During the incident, which was said to be taking place in a car park, a police officer was taken hostage. Officers responded by firing tear gas, and the people inside the prison truck subsequently suffocated to death. 
The detainees were held pending investigations into the Ramses Square clashes, the report added. 
AFP cited official sources that said the men were teargassed after starting a prison mutiny, and that they were all Islamists.  
Reuters quoted the Interior Ministry statement as saying that a number of detainees tried to escape from a prison on the outskirts of Cairo and had taken a police officer hostage. An undisclosed number of people had died from inhaling tear gas rounds in subsequent clashes, the agency said, adding that the officer was freed but badly wounded.

Al Jazeera quoted a source who said that all 38 prisoners were actually shot after taking a police officer hostage. The media outlet also said the men were being transported to the Cairo prison, adding that they were all detained in the Al-Fath mosque siege.  
The Anti-Coup Alliance issued a statement claiming that it had "obtained evidence of the assassination of at least 38 anti-coup detainees in a truck transferring them to Abu Zaabal prison."

The group said it “puts full criminal responsibility” on the leaders of the July 3 military coup, including Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Interior Minister Mohamed Ibrahim Kamel, and demanded an international investigation into the “horrific crime.” 

Militants kill 24 policemen in Egypt's Sinai

Militants kill 24 policemen in Egypt's Sinai

At least 24 Egyptian policemen were killed and three wounded in an ambush by suspected Islamist militants on Monday near the north Sinai town of Rafah, medical and security officials said. The policemen were on their way to their barracks in Rafah, near the border with Israel, when militants attacked them with machineguns and rocket-propelled grenades, Reuters said. According to earlier reports, the casualties were caused by an explosion.

Karzai sacks Afghan attorney general over meeting with Taliban peace negotiators

Karzai sacks Afghan attorney general over meeting with Taliban peace negotiators

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has sacked Attorney General Muhammad Isaaq Aloko for holding an unauthorized meeting with Taliban peace negotiators in Dubai, Reuters cited a senior official and a lawmaker as saying. However, an official in Aloko’s office denied the report, saying that the attorney general was at Kabul’s presidential palace “celebrating Independence Day” on Monday. The senior official said some Cabinet members were trying to persuade Karzai to reinstate Aloko. Peace talks with the Taliban have dragged on since 2010, but have been marked by a series of missteps and delays.